|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
But if Bodiam’s original chimney is on Bluebell’s No.55 “Stepney”, then when was it removed from “Bodiam”? Which chimney does “Bodiam” now carry? And how did Bluebell manage to end up with 32670’s Copper Capped Chimney on 32655? Is there anyone out there who can solve this mystery? - E N D - and Which Terrier’s chimney by P CooperFirst
published in issue 54 of The Tenterden Terrier Spring 1991 Sir – In the latest Tenterden Terrier, Emma Shane wrote asking about “Stepney’s” and “Bodiam’s” chimneys. It seems to be firmly established that “Stepney’s” present chimney was fitted at Eastleigh Works in May 1960, while the locomotive was being prepared for sale to the Bluebell Railway. But No.32670 “Bodiam” was also in the Works at that time, the relevant dates, taken from their record cards, being: 32655 – In 02/05/1960 Out 12/05/1960 – Light casual repair 32670 – In 07/04/1960 Out 07/05/1960 – General repair From this it seems quite clear that when 32655 went into Eastleigh Works to be prepared for sale, No.32670, one of the few Terriers retaining a copper capped chimney, happened by chance to be already in the works, someone took advantage to switch the chimneys. Confirmation form someone who saw the chimneys being swapped, would be nice, but it seems clear enough from the evidence that this is what must have happened. Photographic evidence certainly seems to confirm it - E N D - Footnotes:- On the balance of evidence presented, we can be reasonably certain that 32655 acquired the chimney off 32670 “accidentally on purpose” at the very least, but what of its subsequent history on “Stepney”? And then of course there is the question of where the chimney came from in the first place. The comment in Mr Knight’s letter about copper capped chimneys in the 1930s gives more credence to the supposition that from around 1930 originally Stroudley chimneys were becoming life-expiring; yet another clue to suggest that chimneys were a key factor in the decline and fall of Stephens’s Terriers around that time. Whatever chimney No.3 had after its 1930s rebuild would be pure supposition and there is no reason to suppose the same in this form was retained right through until 1960, whatever the photographic evidence might suggest HN-21/03/2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ART PRINT | BODIAM | KNOWLE | GALLERY | NEWS & EVENTS | ARTICLES | ABOUT US | CONTACT | HOME | LINKS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||